Friday, July 30, 2010
Can be depressing/frustrating.
| Reactions: |
Sue Dent gives more advice.
Yes. I know, whether you want it or not. LOL So an interested party contacted me recently to ask me about an editor I used and at the same time they let me know they were thinking of self-publishing with Westbow (Westbrook?) Thomas Nelson's POD entity.
After chatting with them I learned they were looking at Westbow due to their Bookstore Advantage Plan, a plan that supposedly offers to have employees actively sell your books to Brick & Mortar bookstores for you. My advice, save your money. Most self-pubbed authors thinks this means that by some miracle a big publisher like Thomas Nelson will be able to use their "clout" to get your POD book in a Brick & Mortar bookstore. Guess again. Not even Thomas Nelson can get your book into a Brick & Mortar bookstore and so you're wasting your money paying them for this. Put your money somewhere else.
Brick & Mortar stores don't stock POD books because they don't have to and they make all their money off books published by the larger publishers. Westbow "marketing" peeps might be able to get some non-affiliated "Christian" bookstore to buy a few of your books but you'll have to make your books returnable and they will come right back at you. You'll eat the profit and eat the book because you'll never see it again (that's pretty much standard with all POD's.
Paying a POD publisher to market your book is a WASTE OF YOUR MONEY!!!!! Don't do it!!!
There. That's my advice for today. ;)
Do know that when I say Brick & Mortar stores I mean the once small bookstores that have grown into modern day Frankensteins as far as who they support. Small and Independently owned Brick & Mortar Bookstores have and always will ROCK!!!!
| Reactions: |
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Vamp Fest 2010 - Vampire Film Festival
| Reactions: |
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Ragging on Harlequin's AuthorSolutions
Wow! I ran across this blog today and I have to say my jaw dropped (again.) But it's been doing that a LOT lately or at least ever since I tried to figure out the "publishing industry." HA!
So Harlequin (I misspell this word a lot so just deal with it :)) decided to jump on the POD publisher band wagon with it's AuthorSolutions and found themselves under the gun on the blog linked to above. Their POD publishing model falls directly into line with all the other ones out there but for some reason on this particular blog they were made a target.
Really? Really? Wow! Really?
Are all of you literary agents and posters to said blog clueless?
The original poster pointed out that AuthorSolutions claims to offer the same benefits that their "real" authors writing for Harlequin get. Suggests that they infer the same kind of distribution. Methinks someone should reconsider the adage "if it's too good to be true it probably is!" Also duh! it's their POD publishing model. Anyone who understands why POD publishers came into being KNOWS that you don't get distribution or at least they should. Yes, you get some distribution but nothing you couldn't get on your own. EGADS!!!
Every large publisher out there is adding a POD entity. DEAL WITH IT! The industry's is broken. Larger publishers are only adding POD's to get the rest of the money from the authors they won't ever look at because they don't have to and "you's guys" or "y'all" for my southern friends, keep playing along.
POD publishing is POD publishing and "real" publishing is "real" publishing. You want to take the giant down I suggest you stop stabbing at its toes!!!
| Reactions: |
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Just a reminder. ;)
| Reactions: |
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
5-star review of Forever Richard
| Reactions: |
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Willie Loomis ROCKS!
| Reactions: |
Monday, July 12, 2010
Here we go again.
| Reactions: |
Sunday, July 11, 2010
I figured the mystery out concerning Books-A-Million.
| Reactions: |
Friday, July 09, 2010
New blog post at WordPress.
| Reactions: |
Tuesday, July 06, 2010
Borders and Never Ceese the E-book!!!!
| Reactions: |
Sunday, July 04, 2010
Interesting Amazon Kindle publishing experience.
| Reactions: |
Saturday, July 03, 2010
Independent Distributors
From a site that boast a list of Independent distributors:
Note: No distributor listed below is likely to take on distribution of a single POD (printed-on-demand) book. POD does not lend itself to distribution via distributors, except in the case of backlist books that are being kept in print only via POD. Frontlist books, which are the books that most benefit from distribution by a distributor, need to be produced in sufficient quantity to merit the sales efforts of one of these distributors.
And what are Frontlist books. Here's the clearest definition I could find:
"There are two publishing seasons each year: Spring (January to June) and Fall (July to December). Publishers who issue catalogs used to do so twice a year to match the publishing seasons. The new titles were listed in front of the catalog--hence the name. Older books were listed in the rear of the catalog--hence the name "backlist." . . . This can vary from house to house, but it usually refers to a title that is less than one year old. "Backlist," therefore means a book that has been in print for at least one year."
No distributor listed below [at this link] is likely to take on distribution of a single POD (printed-on-demand) book? Really? And yet distributors such as BookMasters are listed and they pretty much distribute POD books--POD books they themselves print. I suppose the wording "is likely" gives the right for POD distributors such as BookMasters to be listed. And so small publishers flock to BookMasters because they can afford this [so they think until they reap the benefits of fee after fee after fee that ultimately sink any small and POD publisher before they even get out of the gate.
| Reactions: |
Friday, July 02, 2010
So who's accountable for fixing what got broke during the depression: Publishers? Bookstores? Wholesalers?
Just another question that will be answered in my book that may or may not happen depending on how I feel about anyone actually caring whether I write it or not. HA!.
Here's a bit of a clue though to the answer:
"In the 1950's . . . the Ingrams bought the Tennessee Book Company. This company was a textbook depository for the public school systems of Tennessee."
Okay this was Post-depression so you can't EXACTLY blame this wholesaler/distributor[Ingram] although there are TONS of things you can blame Ingram Book Industry for like humoring the exclusively denominational fundamentalist Christians and giving them their very own distributor AND labeling that arm as the distributor to the "official Christian Market" when no such beasts actually exists except in CBA's mind. Thanks a lot Ingram. Like that group needed any help being exclusive but not seeming that way. Good grief!
". . . In terms of business focus, James Baker and Nelson Taylor did not alter the direction of the business they acquired from Robinson and Barber until 1912, when they abandoned publishing entirely and instead directed the company toward wholesaling."
Dun, dun duuuuuun! and ding, ding, ding! Looks like we might very well have a winner. It will take more research to find out for certain but it is starting to look like that, since 1912 was BEFORE the great depression, the wonderful Baker & Taylor is the wholesaler who cut bookstores of the day the deal of a lifetime! Return all the books you want, in any shape, in any condition, whenever you like . . . just buy the darn things from us. We can't afford to warehouse all these books and we certainly can't let our customers go under !!!
And of course it's a lot harder to take the "deal of a lifetime" back once its been given.
So yes, it looks like Baker & Taylor was the culprit. I'll not comment on whether I felt it was a well-meaning gesture handed out in a very tough time . . . at least not on this blog . . . perhaps in my book that may or may not happen.
| Reactions: |
And one wonders why small publishers don't make it.
Click here to read excerpt in its entirety.
Consider the advance system, whereby a publisher pays an author a nonreturnable up-front fee for a book. If the book doesn't "earn out," in the industry parlance, the publisher simply eats the cost.
| Reactions: |
Thursday, July 01, 2010
Information I'll include in my book for those who want to be published.
What's the deal with returns?
Back in the Depression, when bookstores were going under right and left, publishers realized they had to do something radical to keep booksellers in business. They came up with the idea of returns—a system whereby any bookseller may return any book, with little regard for how long the book was kept or what condition it was in. No one told the book business the Depression ended 70 years ago. We still have a system that—not to put too fine a point on it—sucks. Few other industries operate on what amounts to a giant consignment scheme.
Myself and a few of my friends would like to change the last word in this excerpt to SCAM and not scheme.
This site also explains about "hurt" books or books returned from bookstores. LSI, my current POD publisher states in their operation PDF that your "hurt" book will be returned to you. However, when you ask why you are never given this option, LSI explains that it's because they destroy your "hurt" book and send you a new one for $2.00 waiving the printing fee.
Apparently POD presses like LSI and LSI themselves have decided that it isn't prudent to follow what it written in their own operations manual. They claim the wording just needs to be changed and why wouldn't someone want a new book anyway for just $2.00. Well, because that's one way a publisher can recoup some of their loss? DUH!
If anyone knows of a distributor who will actually make sure you get your "hurt" book back, I'd love to know about them. ;)
| Reactions: |
Attention bookstores who chose distribution through Spring Arbor.
How ridiculous to waste a publisher's time by suggesting approval to a particular targeted and discriminative market would give that non-participating publisher access to that market. But hey that's Ingram and they can do whatever they like.
Since belonging to Spring Arbor does nothing for non-CBA participating publishers or authors (except to make the books available for purchase through participating bookstores who won't allow non-participating publishers in, I will withdraw my approval.
This actually doesn't affect anything BUT for those Christian bookstores who only sign up with Spring Arbor to get the few CBA titles they want (which they have to buy so many of that they can't afford to stock non-CBA Christian titles, you'll have to order my books directly from Ingram. I've no intention of being a token publisher to an industry that discriminates based on denomination. If you're a bookstore who only accepts books through Spring Arbor then that would make you a fundamentalist discriminating bookstore and well you'll be happy to know you'll never be able to make any money off my titles. ;)
My books are available anywhere the sun shines and everywhere it doesn't but as of today, they will NOT be available for you to order through ANY Christian bookstore that orders through Spring Arbor. DUH!
Thanks Spring Arbor for being so up front about things. LSI too. They didn't say one word about it.
| Reactions: |